agriculture | asatru | copywrongs | humor | musings | politics | technology | index | haxton.org  
   
MacRaven Logo
MacRaven
Dave Haxton's Weblog
Musings, Reflections, Rants and Comments from a Hoosier Heathen husband, father, grandfather, farmer and software engineer. There's really only one of me ...

Contact Me   

RSS Feed   

←May→
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

The Blogroll
A Mindful Life The Accidental Smallholder Asahel's Search Austro-Athenian Empire Brad Spangler DiRT Dispatches Garden of Thought Hardscrabble Creek The High Seat Knit Together Laudator Temporis Acti Little Heathen Fox Lorrie's Livejournal Masson's Blog Mutualist Blog MyAppleMenu nobody asked, BUT NoNAIS Notes on Religion Numenous Thoughts OrangeGuru Overlawyered Prophet or Madman rogueclassicism Secular Blasphemy Sugar Mountain Farm TMN Thud Factor Wildhunt Blog within the crainium

Page Loaded at

Eastern Standard Time

Support Denmark!

No NAIS!

MLL


lunar phases
 


Click for Thorntown, Indiana Forecast

        

Wed, 07 May 2008
Who Owns Software?

This could get really crazy if the court fails to see the implications of ruling against a program that "cheats" ...

SeeSp0tRun writes to remind us of Blizzard's lawsuit against MDY Industries over the Glider cheat. It seems that Blizzard is pushing it even further. They're trying out the legal theory that a software creator retains complete control over how a program is used, meaning that anyone who uses it in a different way could be found guilty of copyright infringement, at $750 a pop. The EFF and Public Knowledge are among the organizations trying to assure that the court doesn't set a really bad precedent here.

(link) [Slashdot]

Wed, 07 May 2008 07:07 /Copywrongs | 0 writebacks | permanent link