Fri, 18 May 2007

How Far Should a Job Screening Go?

Gee, why am I not surprised by this? They routinely sample your urine, run credit checks and hunt down your kindergarten classmates for references, why shouldn't they want fingerprints?

Why does this continue? Simple: because we, as a nation, continue to allow it. I certainly hope this fellows sister finds another job. With an employer who understands that they're hiring an employee, not purchasing a slave.

My sister is getting screened for a programming position with a financial firm. I was alarmed to hear she'll be getting fingerprinted at the Sheriff's Office as part of the screening process. Instantly I conjure up scenes of frame-ups and corporate scandals. I want to know, should this raise a flag? Would you submit to fingerprinting, blood tests and who knows what else (financial, genetic code, and so forth) for a programming position?

(link) [Slashdot]

/Politics | 2 writebacks | permanent link


On 5/20/2007 17:23:32
Fred Geisler wrote


On 5/21/2007 06:30:37
Dave H wrote

Sad but true


comment...

 
Notes: If you put a <mailto:> link in the URL field your address will not be mangled: this could be a bad idea as your email address could be easily harvested by bots designed for SPAM. The comments field should now format correctly for line feeds and carriage returns: when you hit the 'Enter' or 'Return' keys in your comment it should break to a new line. The text should wrap cleanly. Please let me know if it doesn't. No HTML tags will pass through - entering links seems to be the main cause of comment SPAM. Also, please be sure that Javascript is enabled in your browser before attempting to post a writeback. Sorry for any inconvenience, but this really helps cut down on the amount of comment SPAM I have to deal with.
 
 Name:
 URL:(optional)
 Title: (optional)
 Comments:  
Save my Name and URL/Email for next time