agriculture | asatru | copywrongs | humor | musings | politics | technology | index haxton.org  
   
MacRaven Logo
MacRaven
Dave Haxton's Weblog

Musings, Reflections, Rants and Comments from a Hoosier Heathen husband, father, grandfather, farmer and software engineer. There's really only one of me ...


Contact Me   


RSS Feed   


November
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
           
21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            



The Blogroll
A Mindful Life The Accidental Smallholder Asahel's Search Austro-Athenian Empire Brad Spangler Cauldron Born DiRT Dispatches Garden of Thought Hardscrabble Creek Honk & Helen In Siberia Laudator Temporis Acti Left Libertarian Little Heathen Fox Lorrie's Livejournal Masson's Blog Mutualist Blog MyAppleMenu nobody asked, BUT NoNAIS Notes on Religion Numenous Thoughts OrangeGuru Overlawyered Prophet or Madman rogueclassicism Secular Blasphemy Sugar Mountain Farm TMN Thud Factor Wildhunt Blog within the crainium

Page Loaded at

Eastern Standard Time

Support Denmark!

No NAIS!

MLL


lunar phases
 


Click for Thorntown, Indiana Forecast

       

home :: Politics :: One_percent_red...llion.writeback

Tue, 04 Apr 2006

One percent reduction in cancer mortality would be worth nearly $500 billion

There's some serious playing around with numbers in here:

Social value of improved health and longevity is the amount in dollars that additional life years or other health improvements are worth to people, the report said. The value of improved longevity is based on what individuals gain from the enjoyment of consumption and time during an additional year of life, rather than how much they earn.

So how, exactly, does one calculate "social value"? The obvious answer: any way one wants to, preferably using the method that will buttress whatever conclusion you're trying to reach. Note that these conclusions usually involve political policy choices (such as this one, arguing for more allocation of Federal research money towards cancer research).

While the goals may be admirable, the methods are not. These kinds of studies don't cook data, they literally fabricate it.

Even a modest one percent reduction in mortality from cancer would be worth nearly $500 billion in social value, according to a new study by economists Kevin Murphy and Robert Topel of the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. Finding a cure for cancer would be worth about $50 trillion.

(link) [EurekAlert!]

/Politics | 0 writebacks | permanent link


writebacks...

comment...

 
Notes: If you put a <mailto:> link in the URL field your address will not be mangled: this could be a bad idea as your email address could be easily harvested by bots designed for SPAM. The comments field should now format correctly for line feeds and carriage returns: when you hit the 'Enter' or 'Return' keys in your comment it should break to a new line. The text should wrap cleanly. Please let me know if it doesn't. No HTML tags will pass through - entering links seems to be the main cause of comment SPAM. Also, please be sure that Javascript is enabled in your browser before attempting to post a writeback. Sorry for any inconvenience, but this really helps cut down on the amount of comment SPAM I have to deal with.
 
 Name:
 URL:(optional)
 Title: (optional)
 Comments:  
Save my Name and URL/Email for next time