agriculture | asatru | copywrongs | humor | musings | politics | technology | index haxton.org  
   
MacRaven Logo
MacRaven
Dave Haxton's Weblog

Musings, Reflections, Rants and Comments from a Hoosier Heathen husband, father, grandfather, farmer and software engineer. There's really only one of me ...


Contact Me   


RSS Feed   


March
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
           
11
         



The Blogroll
A Mindful Life The Accidental Smallholder Asahel's Search Austro-Athenian Empire Brad Spangler Cauldron Born DiRT Dispatches Garden of Thought Hardscrabble Creek Honk & Helen In Siberia Laudator Temporis Acti Left Libertarian Little Heathen Fox Lorrie's Livejournal Masson's Blog Mutualist Blog MyAppleMenu nobody asked, BUT NoNAIS Notes on Religion Numenous Thoughts OrangeGuru Overlawyered Prophet or Madman rogueclassicism Secular Blasphemy Sugar Mountain Farm TMN Thud Factor Wildhunt Blog within the crainium

Page Loaded at

Eastern Standard Time

Support Denmark!

No NAIS!

MLL


lunar phases
 


Click for Thorntown, Indiana Forecast

       

Tue, 11 Mar 2008
Spitzer Is Linked to a Sex Ring as Client

Looks like his career's finally going up in smoke ...

Gov. Eliot Spitzer was a client of a high-end prostitution ring broken up last week by federal authorities, according to law enforcement officials.

(link) [New York Times]

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:22 /Politics | 0 writebacks | permanent link


Tenth Anniversary of First Commercial MP3 Player

Hard to believe it's been ten years, eh?

The first commercially released personal music player capable of handling MP3 files was launched in March 1998 — the MPMan F10, manufactured by Korea's Saehan Information Systems with 32MB of Flash storage, enough for a handful of songs encoded at 128Kb/s. In the US, local supplier Eiger Labs wanted $250 for the F10, though the price fell to $200 the following year prompted by the release of the Diamond Multimedia Rio PMP300. The Rio was released in September 1998, but by 8 October had become the subject of a lawsuit from the RIAA which claimed the player violated the 1992 US Home Recordings Act. It was later ruled that the Rio had not infringed the Act because it was not responsible for the actions of its customers. Thanks to its lesser known name, the F10 avoided such legal entanglements, but at the cost of all the free publicity its rival gained from the lawsuit.

(link) [Slashdot]

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:54 /Technology | 0 writebacks | permanent link