Having spent a good portion of my childhood near the Rose City I'm just a tad familiar with the horticulture industry as it existed 40 years ago, and I can assure you that the globalization praised in this puff piece also has it's casualties.

I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to Google for all the subsidies, foreign aid and other government support that goes into growing roses for export in Kenya (or India). Suffice it to say you'll be reading for a while.

Curiously, depending on your choice of search terms, you'll also turn up numerous screeds against Western (American and European) agricultural subsidies, and how they're destroying Third World farmers.

If a rose by any other name smells as sweet, the stench of hypocrisy rankles as badly, no matter if it's called "development aid" or "farm subsidy".

The view persists that a rose is a rose is a rose. But that's so 20th century! In this new era a rose is a global product vested with the power to bring social and environmental change.

(link) [New York Times]

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:26 /Agriculture | 1 writeback | permanent link

Could somebody please explain to me how implementing NAIS would've prevented or even mitigated this situation? I'd be willing to bet that, given access to existing purchase records right now, we could tell with a great degree of certainty exactly where the cow in the video came from. NAIS might make this identification easier. But how does that knowledge keep the downer cow from entering the food supply?

The short answer is: it doesn't. That's the long answer, too.

The president of a slaughterhouse at the heart of the largest-ever meat recall grudgingly admitted that his company had apparently introduced sick cows into the hamburger supply.

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:08 /Agriculture | 1 writeback | permanent link