Cluelessness knows no boundaries. One of the core definitions of life is that it ends: can a thing that never dies be said to be truly living? But the denial of death is not limited to genius computer scientists: it happens all across this overly materialistic culture we inhabit.

So while I don't think Mr. Kurzweil's goal is achievable, let's take a look at the some of the inevitable consequences that would be foisted upon us if it were.

First off, it'll be expensive. Will medical insurance cover it in the US? How about in countries with national healthcare? What would that do to tax rates? How about in the Third World: imagine the restlessness of a poor population doomed to die while the rich have immortality. How would that play out politically?

Assuming that immortality is only worth it if you maintain a good degree of physical prowess, imagine with me the prospect of the childbearing years lasting essentially forever. Malthus would finally be absolutely correct.

And finally, imagine the boredom that would accompany literal, physical immortality: "Been there, done that!" would take on a whole new meaning.

This is one technological pipe dream that'll never happen. And thank the gods for that!

A famed computer scientist and inventor adheres to a strict health regimen so he'll live long enough for humanity achieve immortality. Ray Kurzweil predicts humans will make that goal in no more than 20 years.

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:00 /Technology | 0 writebacks | permanent link

This guy hits the nail right on the head - I miss'em too!

Remember Republicans? Sober men in suits, pipes, who'd nod thoughtfully over their latest tract on market-driven fiscal conservatism while grinding out the numbers on rocket science. Remember those serious-looking 1950's-1960's science guys in the movies -- Republican to a one.

(link) [Kung Fu Monkey]

via the newest entry on my Blogroll: Prophet or Madman

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:00 /Politics | 0 writebacks | permanent link