MacRaven - Dave Haxton's Weblog

Mon, 29 May 2006

A fine essay on why we North Americans go mad banning cigarettes as a precaution, yet continue to ignore (and evade) many more sensible precautionary steps we could take on the food chain or in the environment. And why Europe seems to take the exact opposite tack.

When we North Americans find out that smoking is bad for us, our inner Puritans rise to the challenge with a self-righteousness and commitment that we would never apply to heavy metals in the environment.

(link) [Toranto Star]

via MyAppleMenu:Reader

/Agriculture | 3 writebacks | permanent link

On 5/30/2006 06:56:38
Arwin wrote

Mind if I f@rt revisited

By the way: Ireland has banned smoking in their pubs. Europe is following North America on this one. What this whole argument comes down to is either smokers are inconvenienced because they can no longer light up where ever they please or non-smokers are inconsiderately exposed to smoke they would rather avoid. I'm all for public smoking bans because I won't be annoyed at a minimum, or exposed to stuff that could negatively affect my health at a maximum if public smoking is banned. I know the argument: there are many things I'm exposed to that will negatively affect my health, some self administered, and some more dangerous than smoking. For the self administered stuff that's my choice. Just like smoking is a smokers choice. Smoking crosses a line when the smoker insists on subjecting others to what many consider objectionable for many rational reasons. It is fine with me if smokers want to take the health risks, just like skiers, mountain climbers, sky divers, and others who pursue dangerous pastimes. The difference is when I'm setting in a restaurant in Indianapolis it is unlikely a skier will crash through a wall and injure me or disrupt my meal. There is the argument that smokers take a dip in the government treasury to pay for medical bills and therefore smoking should be completely outlawed. I agree with posts Dave has made elsewhere in this blog. That goes too far. If smoking is outlawed will skiing and other risky activities follow? Now another nod to Dave. It sounds to me like the Ontario legislation goes too far. I can tolerate dining outside when a smoker is nearby. More so if I'm setting upwind. :-) I guess the nicotine addition is particularly powerful after a meal. Too bad, not my problem. Just as considerate parents usher crying tots or misbehaving youngsters out of a restaurant, a considerate smoker would take a little stroll after his/her restaurant meal in deference to his/her fellow diners. Unfortunately on both counts many people aren't that considerate to their fellow diners. To make an even playing field, any smoking ban should allow for establishments to be either no-smoking or must smoke. In the latter if you don't light up you are ejected. You hear business owners whine about the business they would lose if a smoking ban is imposed. If smoking bans allowed for must smoke establishments the owners could make a choice. Then the market could decide. You do know this last paragraph is tough in cheek.

On 5/30/2006 06:59:56
Arwin wrote

Correction

That's tongue in cheek. I hate it when I goof up like that :-)

On 5/30/2006 07:08:56
Dave H wrote

Tough in Cheek?

There for a minute I'd thought you'd taken up dippin' snuff! ;>) For a somewhat humorous perspective on all this madness, have you seen Woody Allen's movie 'Sleeper'? If it shows up on the late show and you've got insomnia you oughta check it out... Thank for the comment (or should I say additional post? - I had one paragraph, you took eight!!!) and, Be well, Dave H.

:: Categories ::

agriculture
asatru
copywrongs
humor
musings
politics
technology
index
haxton.org

:: Search ::

:: Blogroll ::

A Mindful Life
The Accidental Smallholder
Austro-Athenian Empire
Cauldron Born
Center for a Stateless Society
Dances with Ewes
Dispatches
egregores
Hardscrabble Creek
Honk & Helen
In Siberia
Laudator Temporis Acti
Lorrie's Livejournal
Masson's Blog
MyAppleMenu
NoNAIS
Notes on Religion
Numenous Thoughts
OrangeGuru
Overlawyered
Prophet or Madman
rogueclassicism
Sugar Mountain Farm
Thud Factor
Universe of Discourse
Wildhunt Blog
within the crainium

:: Archives ::

←May →
Sun	Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat
	1	2	3	4	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30	31

:: Site ::

Contact Me

MacRaven
Dave Haxton's Weblog
Musings, Reflections, Rants and Comments from a Hoosier Heathen husband, father, grandfather, farmer and software engineer. There's really only one of me ...

lunar phases

Unless otherwise noted, all original
work on this site is licensed under a

comment...


Notes: If you put a <mailto:> link in the URL field your address will not be mangled: this could be a bad idea as your email address could be easily harvested by bots designed for SPAM. The comments field should now format correctly for line feeds and carriage returns: when you hit the 'Enter' or 'Return' keys in your comment it should break to a new line. The text should wrap cleanly. Please let me know if it doesn't. No HTML tags will pass through - entering links seems to be the main cause of comment SPAM. Also, please be sure that Javascript is enabled in your browser before attempting to post a writeback. Sorry for any inconvenience, but this really helps cut down on the amount of comment SPAM I have to deal with.

Name:
URL:	(optional)
Title:	(optional)
Comments:
Save my Name and URL/Email for next time